Bioz AI Empowering Scientific Research

nb110 89474af405 anti mouse cd11c novus biologicals (Novus Biologicals)

Novus Biologicals nb110 89474af405 anti mouse cd11c novus biologicals

Figure 4. BIRC2 Knockdown in Melanoma Cells Decreases Tumor Growth and Alters Inﬂammatory Cell Recruitment to the Tumor Micro- environment (A) B16F10 subclones expressing NTC or BIRC2 shRNA (sh3 or sh4) were implanted subcutaneously in female C57BL/6 mice, and tumor growth was monitored. (B–F) Tumors were harvested on day 35 and the percentage of CD8+/CD44+/CD69+ activated T cells (B), CD11b+/NK1.1+ NK cells (C), <t>CD11b+/CD11c+/F4/80</t>

Nb110 89474af405 Anti Mouse Cd11c Novus Biologicals, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/nb110 89474af405 anti mouse cd11c novus biologicals/product/Novus Biologicals
Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews

nb110 89474af405 anti mouse cd11c novus biologicals - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03

91/100 stars

Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results

Journal: Cell reports

Article Title: BIRC2 Expression Impairs Anti-Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy Efficacy.

doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108073

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 4. BIRC2 Knockdown in Melanoma Cells Decreases Tumor Growth and Alters Inﬂammatory Cell Recruitment to the Tumor Micro- environment (A) B16F10 subclones expressing NTC or BIRC2 shRNA (sh3 or sh4) were implanted subcutaneously in female C57BL/6 mice, and tumor growth was monitored. (B–F) Tumors were harvested on day 35 and the percentage of CD8+/CD44+/CD69+ activated T cells (B), CD11b+/NK1.1+ NK cells (C), CD11b+/CD11c+/F4/80

Article Snippet: REAGENT or RESOURCE SOURCE IDENTIFIER Antibodies Anti-mouse BIRC2 Novus Biologicals Cat# NB100-56889 Anti-mouse b-Actin Santa Cruz Biotechnology Cat# sc-47778 Anti-mouse CD3 BioLegend Cat# 102102 Anti-mouse CD3 Novus Biologicals Cat# FAB4841G-100 Anti-mouse CD4 Novus Biologicals Cat# FAB554A-100 Anti-mouse CD8A Novus Biologicals Cat# NBP1-49045PE Anti-mouse CD11b Novus Biologicals Cat# NB110-89474AF405 Anti-mouse CD11c Novus Biologicals Cat# NB110-40766AF488 Anti-mouse CD25 Novus Biologicals Cat# NBP2-27425AF488 Anti-mouse CD28 BioLegend Cat# 100223 Anti-mouse CD44 Novus Biologicals Cat# NBP1-47386APC Anti-mouse CD45 Novus Biologicals Cat# NB100-77417AF488 Anti-mouse CD45 Novus Biologicals Cat# NB100-77417AF405 Anti-mouse CD69 Novus Biologicals Cat# NBP1-28011AF488 Anti-mouse CD80 Novus Biologicals Cat# NBP1-43385AF488 Anti-mouse CD314 Novus Biologicals Cat# FAB1547V-100UG Anti-mouse F4/80 Novus Biologicals Cat# NB600-404APC Anti-mouse FoxP3 Novus Biologicals Cat# NB100-39002PE Anti-human HIF-1a Novus Biologicals Cat# NB100-479 Anti-human HIF-1b Novus Biologicals Cat# NB100-124 Anti-human HIF-2a Novus Biologicals Cat# NB100-122 Anti-mouse IFNG Novus Biologicals Cat# IC485V-100UG Anti-mouse Ly6c Novus Biologicals Cat# NBP1-28046AF488 Anti-mouse Ly6g Novus Biologicals Cat# FAB1037A-100 Anti-mouse NK1.1 Novus Biologicals Cat# NB100-77528APC Anti-mouse p50 Novus Biologicals Cat# NBP2-6735 Anti-mouse Rel A Novus Biologicals Cat# NB100-2176 Anti-mouse Rel B Novus Biologicals Cat# NBP2-20123 Anti-mouse a-Tubulin Novus Biologicals Cat# NB600-506 Armenian Hamster IgG, anti-mouse CXCL9 (MIG) Bio X Cell Cat# BE0309 Polyclonal Armenian hamster IgG Bio X Cell Cat# BE0091 Syrian Hamster IgG, anti-mouse CTLA-4 Bio X Cell Cat# BP0131 Rat IgG2a, k, anti-mouse PD-1 (CD279) Bio X Cell Cat# BP0146 Rat IgG2a isotype control Bio X Cell Cat# BE0089 Chemicals, Peptides, and Recombinant Proteins Acriflavine Sigma Aldrich SKU # A8126 TRIzol Reagent Invitrogen Cat# 15596026 Puromycin Dihydrochloride ThermoFisher Cat# A1113803 ECL Prime Western Blotting System GE Healthcare SKU# GERPN2232 PolyJet In Vitro DNA Transfection Reagent Signagen Cat # SL100688 Rabbit anti-mouse IgG-HRP Santa Cruz Biotech Cat# sc-358914 Rabbit IgG HRP Linked Whole Ab GE Healthcare SKU# GENA934 (Continued on next page) e1 Cell Reports 32, 108073, August 25, 2020

Techniques: Knockdown, Expressing, shRNA

Figure 5. BIRC2 Knockdown in Breast Can- cer Cells Decreases Tumor Growth and Al- ters Inﬂammatory Cell Recruitment to the Tumor Microenvironment (A) EMT6 subclones expressing NTC or either of two shRNAs targeting BIRC2 (sh4 and sh5) were cultured at 20% O2 and analyzed for expression of BIRC2 protein by immunoblot assay. (B) EMT6 subclones (NTC, sh4, and sh5) were im- planted into the mammary fat pad of female BALB/c mice, and tumor volumes were determined (mean ± SEM; n = 4); *p < 0.05 (Kruskal-Wallis test with Benjamini-Hochberg post-test). (C–F) Tumors were harvested on day 13, and the percentage of CD8+/CD44+/CD69+ activated T cells (C), CD3/NK1.1+ NK cells (D), CD11b+/F4/ 80/CD11c+ DCs (E), and CD11b+/Ly6C+ MDSCs (F) was determined (mean ± SEM; n = 4); *p < 0.05 for the indicated pairs (Kruskal-Wallis test with Benjamini-Hochberg post-test). All immune cell populations were calculated as a percentage of the total number of live cells (based on forward and side scatter). (G) EMT6 subclones were implanted into the mammary fat pad of female SCID mice, and tumor growth was monitored. See also Figure S3B.

Journal: Cell reports

Article Title: BIRC2 Expression Impairs Anti-Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy Efficacy.

doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108073

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 5. BIRC2 Knockdown in Breast Can- cer Cells Decreases Tumor Growth and Al- ters Inﬂammatory Cell Recruitment to the Tumor Microenvironment (A) EMT6 subclones expressing NTC or either of two shRNAs targeting BIRC2 (sh4 and sh5) were cultured at 20% O2 and analyzed for expression of BIRC2 protein by immunoblot assay. (B) EMT6 subclones (NTC, sh4, and sh5) were im- planted into the mammary fat pad of female BALB/c mice, and tumor volumes were determined (mean ± SEM; n = 4); *p < 0.05 (Kruskal-Wallis test with Benjamini-Hochberg post-test). (C–F) Tumors were harvested on day 13, and the percentage of CD8+/CD44+/CD69+ activated T cells (C), CD3/NK1.1+ NK cells (D), CD11b+/F4/ 80/CD11c+ DCs (E), and CD11b+/Ly6C+ MDSCs (F) was determined (mean ± SEM; n = 4); *p < 0.05 for the indicated pairs (Kruskal-Wallis test with Benjamini-Hochberg post-test). All immune cell populations were calculated as a percentage of the total number of live cells (based on forward and side scatter). (G) EMT6 subclones were implanted into the mammary fat pad of female SCID mice, and tumor growth was monitored. See also Figure S3B.

Techniques: Knockdown, Expressing, Cell Culture, Western Blot

Figure 6. BIRC2 Knockdown in B16F10 Cells Increases Anti-tumor Immunity by Increasing CXCL9 Expression (A) NTC and BIRC2-KD subclones were implanted into C57BL/6 mice. When BIRC2-KD tumors became palpable, mice were treated with anti-CXCL9 or IgG every 3 days. Tumor volumes were determined (mean ± SEM; n = 4); *p < 0.05 (Kruskal-Wallis test with Benjamini-Hochberg post-test). (B–E) Tumors were harvested on day 35, and the percentage of CD8+ T cells (relative to CD45+ population) (B), CD8+/CD44+/CD69+ T cells (C), CD3/NK1.1+ NK cells (D), and CD11b+/CD11c+/F4/80 DCs (E) was determined (mean ± SEM; n = 4); *p < 0.05 (Kruskal-Wallis test with Benjamini-Hochberg post-test). All immune cell populations (except B) were calculated as a percentage of the total live cells (based on forward and side scatter). (F–H) The Pearson correlation test was performed to compare CXCL9 mRNA expression with CD8+ T cell score (F), NK cell score (G), and DC score (H), using TCGA data from 481 human melanomas. See also Figures S3C and S4.

Journal: Cell reports

Article Title: BIRC2 Expression Impairs Anti-Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy Efficacy.

doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108073

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 6. BIRC2 Knockdown in B16F10 Cells Increases Anti-tumor Immunity by Increasing CXCL9 Expression (A) NTC and BIRC2-KD subclones were implanted into C57BL/6 mice. When BIRC2-KD tumors became palpable, mice were treated with anti-CXCL9 or IgG every 3 days. Tumor volumes were determined (mean ± SEM; n = 4); *p < 0.05 (Kruskal-Wallis test with Benjamini-Hochberg post-test). (B–E) Tumors were harvested on day 35, and the percentage of CD8+ T cells (relative to CD45+ population) (B), CD8+/CD44+/CD69+ T cells (C), CD3/NK1.1+ NK cells (D), and CD11b+/CD11c+/F4/80 DCs (E) was determined (mean ± SEM; n = 4); *p < 0.05 (Kruskal-Wallis test with Benjamini-Hochberg post-test). All immune cell populations (except B) were calculated as a percentage of the total live cells (based on forward and side scatter). (F–H) The Pearson correlation test was performed to compare CXCL9 mRNA expression with CD8+ T cell score (F), NK cell score (G), and DC score (H), using TCGA data from 481 human melanomas. See also Figures S3C and S4.

Techniques: Knockdown, Expressing

Review

Similar Products

Image Search Results